MS seems to have no problem with sharing titles between 360 and PC. I'm pretty sure that was part of the motive behind designing the 360 around the PC's architecture, to lure more devs into developing in a familiar environment. It seems that devs might finally start getting the hang of moving between PS3 and PC so I hope we see more titles shared between the two.
They quote an official Sony spokesperson discussing (or rather not discussing) the charge in an email to them. Sounds like a pretty credible source.
Or has MTV Multiplayer made up sources in the past? I dunno, I never read them.
@Unicron: That's how you get hits I guess. Title says Infamous vs Prototype but they really mean PS3 vs 360. And I think that's unfair because now you have a bunch of fanboys trashing each game AND the devs not based on their merits, but on petty console leanings.
It'll be interesting to see how well this translates to the PC. I don't think I've seen any PS3/PC only titles. Let's hope they set a good example for other devs interested in following the same path.
Yeah, I was put off by MGS Touch too. These upcoming titles have to impress if they want me to respect the iPhone alongside the PSP/DS.
"Is 'Braid' Really That Good?"
Yes.
It's probably not the best game you'll ever play. That's largely up to the gamer's preference. But it's an exceptionally well done platformer. The media always goes overboard with praise so I could understand why someone might think the game feels overrated.
You'll take on anyone, but will you win?
I won't be basing my choice of browsers off who TALKS the best game.
Let's see if it's worth the effort of making challenges when IE goes live.
I think it's a vote of confidence to be disappointed in their DLC drought. Perhaps it comes with the implication that they won't screw us like some others *coughhadoukencough*
Either way, plenty of titles haven't yet hopped on the DLC train and the games haven't suffered for it.
No comment? No sh*t.
Even if they never bring it to the PS3, they will try to keep the option open. There's no good reason to burn that bridge before you have to.
All this confirms is what we know already. The interest in bringing ME to PS3 is there. Whether such interest comes with active pursuit is not something upon which I have enough info to speculate.
At least these show some girls actually playing games as opposed to posing with controllers. Key word: posing.
Ages 10-14... Humans or Pixies... That is way outta my confluence of interests. Seems like a cross between WoW and Animal Crossing.
I like the general idea of a world that lets you do more than fill a combat role. Though I definitely won't be playing this.
I can't tell if you're actually trying to report more news or having a joke with MS. Source might help if you're trying to be informative.
I definitely had a browse through and I really don't remember too much of any of these. A lot of these are just little known mods and hacks.
That commercial for Conflict: Denied Ops is hilariously tasteless. I guarantee there are easier ways to see boobs, none of which require military training.
Really doesn't matter how much you love games if you can't treat your body better.
Fair news. I'm glad the guy's getting into a new RPG and I hope it's great.
I don't think we'll be revisiting the roots of those isometric masterpieces anytime soon. Different time, different tech, different expectations. Fallout 3 wasn't terrible, but I think they missed the mark for fans of the old series completely. I feel as if devs play it safe with RPGs that come to consoles by focusing on the action and production values over the role-playing. That's the only reason I can ...
I know it wasn't a PS1 game specifically, but the same era: D&D: Shadow Over Mystaria. So few people own that excellent game (legally) it's a shame. Heck of a deep beat em' up and it seems well suited for today's online multiplayer.
If not, I'd be happy with some REs or BoFs as well.
@8.0: That's a bit much. I don't doubt MS having a hand somewhere in the pot, but just a few days ago the guy was busy poking fun at RE, MS, and the 360.
http://www.n4g.com/NewsCom-...
Besides, you don't try to get a popular 3rd party game trashed altogether when it's also selling your own console. That would hurt MS' bottom line as well. Instead, you say it plays/looks better on 360 or s...
The DS or PSP both have longer, deeper, and in cases plain better games than the iPhone currently offers. A ton of titles gamers want just aren't available on the iPhone and have no plans to be ported.
Seems like a roundabout way to ask Capcom to bring back Dudley.
FTR, if we're going by degrees of bare skin, Gill and Urien tie for biggest "ho" in SF ever. :S
Yes, I'm aware that you could simply lie. But there are costs for lying which could and should preclude an untruth of that magnitude. Like falsely quoting a business representative from a large corporate entity. And not only do they quote, they give a specific name (Patrick Seybold) and not some vague "guy in the know" as I'm sure you've seen before.
My point is, would they risk their credibility by telling such an easily disproved lie?